I run across this argument WAY to often. As a way to help set the record straight I post Non Stamp Collector’s Special investigation on the big three strawmen the religiously addled attempt to use when discussing history.
Your opinions…
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- Epstein files: New documents include photos of Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson with late sex offender
- How bad could this flu season get? Here are answers to your influenza questions
- Officer shot as police respond to fence dispute in Welland, Ont., people urged to shelter in place
- Akwesasne parents outraged after photos circulate of 'time out box' in school
- Ryan Wedding’s image as alleged drug kingpin inflated by U.S., says Sinaloa cartel operative
- How a tipster on Reddit helped police identify Brown University shooting suspect
- NDP campaign review cites 'brutal environment' for worst-ever election result
- These grocery items are on the naughty list as food prices keep climbing
- Group loses latest court battle to halt tree removal at Vancouver's Stanley Park
- Trump’s tariffs can’t knock this part of Canada’s economy
Posts I Like
Blogs I Follow
bleatmop
Mystro
The Arbourist
Dead Wild Roses 
7 comments
June 12, 2010 at 11:46 am
The Arbourist
Just testing out a few things.
Neat.
LikeLike
June 13, 2010 at 5:28 pm
Alan Scott
There has to be an element of truth in Sarcasm. The interviews were quite good. The discussion by the two commentators at the end does not have enough truth in it . Their atheist statements are too blatant to be good satire .
LikeLike
June 13, 2010 at 10:00 pm
The Arbourist
I was thinking of a few threads that we participated in when these common misconceptions were brought up about the so called Atheistic regimes. Now I have something to reference when people try to argue incorrectly about history. ‘
Nice to see you over here Mr. Scott, must be a slow day at the Retort :)
LikeLike
June 15, 2010 at 8:54 pm
Alan Scott
The Arbourist,
I think I wore poor Ben Hoffman out. So I figured I’d come over here.
LikeLike
June 15, 2010 at 11:35 pm
The Arbourist
Well thanks for coming by Alan, much appreciated. Unfortunately, people do not comment as frequently here, so its a little more boring. The opinions I express are a little closer to Canadian mainstream thought, so I’m not as controversial as when I start in over at Ben’s place.
Damn Canadians, communists all of them. :)
LikeLike
June 16, 2010 at 3:47 pm
Alan Scott
The Arbourist,
. A lot of your topics do not lend themselves to my talents. Nearly anything Hoffman posts, I feel an overwhelming drive to comment against. So far, other than your anti religious topics, I don’t feel I bring anything to the table . But, I have faith that you will post something I must disagree with.
I was going to make a snide comment about Canada because I spent all morning removing a bent Canadian nickel out of an old payphone, but the way my Country is devaluing it’s currency by printing money, that nickel may soon be worth a lot in greenbacks . Anyway as long as you guys keep sending your oil down here, since we are now too stupid to drill with out asphalting our beeches, I am just fine with Canadian Communism.
LikeLike
July 3, 2012 at 6:02 am
Mansplaining – The Guide. « Dead Wild Roses
[…] Every once and awhile I feel the need to put information that is important into a blog post for easy reference. Today’s post is an amalgamation of the concept of Mansplaining, what it involves and how […]
LikeLike