Teaching religion in public schools as a serious “subject” is just wrong. Religious studies are acceptable, but this is not what this is. Would you want to subject your child to graded learning on how the tooth fairy or easter bunny makes their rounds? Some people do, and want to continue to do so on the public schools educational funds. Christianity teaches hate, it teaches ostracism it teaches xenophobia. My point is affirmed with this breaking news story about how the dear christians are being put upon because:
“However, if the policy developed . (it) means that our Logos teachers and principals would no longer be able to express freely in their classrooms that the homosexual lifestyle is not in accord with their Christian beliefs, and that they would be required to ‘affirm’ homosexual lifestyle as acceptable to traditional Christian family values, then we cannot accept this,” the two-page notice says in bold lettering.
Then my dear deluded friends, you can simply frack the hell off and take your despicable fairy tales with you. Like some of the religiously-challenged the facts of the matter have little sway when it comes to their magic book, this is from their website:
“Certainly, as followers of Jesus, we believe that every child should be free from bullying, whether it is because of his or her physical appearance or their sexual orientation, or for any other reason, and that all persons and families should be treated with respect and dignity. To that extent we support the School Trustees’ concern about bullying. (Yet, if the Trustees would insist that their already-existing policies on bullying were strictly enforced by the Superintendent and school principals, there would be no need for an additional policy at all).”
But wait, let’s see why this program is being enacted…
“There is considerable evidence that sexual-minority youth are at greater risk for harassment, persecution, bullying, suicide attempts and feeling unsafe, Colburn said. Research has also shown generic anti-bullying policies do nothing on their own to protect those kids, he said.
“It’s only when stand-alone policies specifically addressing (sexual minority) populations are in place that the school environment changes dramatically.”
Well I’m completely surprised that the LOGOS program would ignore research and fact when it comes to facing the realization that yes, your hate filled fairy tale hurts children and does not deserve the blind reverence you seemingly give it. I encourage the concerned christians to make more persecution (of the majority) noises about this grievous policy of having to affirm that the homosexual lifestyles are okay. It further highlights the bigotry, ignorance and irrelevance of christian religion in the 21st century and makes the strong case that the taint of religion has no place within the public school system.






4 comments
June 13, 2011 at 6:37 pm
Bleatmop
I have no problem with teaching religion in schools. In fact I encourage it. It’s proselytizing and preaching in school that I have an issue with. Heck, it was studying religion in an academic manner than made atheists out of my wife and me. I mean, when you actually read the contents of any holy book and hold it up to the light of skepticism and reality, said books rapidly become less credible and believable.
LikeLike
June 13, 2011 at 10:36 pm
The Arbourist
I have no problem with teaching religion in schools.
Upon reflection, I would have to agree with you there Bleat, as I am also for the teaching as religion as a subject, as a opposed to “THE TRUTH”. Shedding light on what the religious texts actually say is a good thing.
LikeLike
September 20, 2011 at 6:26 pm
lawlufailed
you know that picture you have at the bottom of this page makes no sense
no where on that womens poster does she say shes adding 1+1 to equal 4
funny how you tried to make fun of christian logic with that and yet it just displays a complete lack of logic on your part
LikeLike
September 20, 2011 at 11:18 pm
The Arbourist
Would you like me to explain what is going on there or are you being obtuse on purpose?
Of course one and one do not equal four, but the idea that the combination of 1 man and 1 woman is the only valid human way for humans to partner up is the twisted logic part. You see, the idea that ‘moral rules’ based on the the musty writings of semi-literate goat herders some 2000 years ago should be relevant now is the bigger picture you are either ignoring or missing.
LikeLike