What is the best way to learn?
Usually by screwing up in a spectacular fashion. Search your memories (Luke) and I bet you can find a lesson painfully learned, but painfully learned well in your past.
Fast forward to school and the increasing focus on tests and testing. Everyone wants to do well on the tests, but how does photocopying facts improve your critical thinking? It doesn’t. Lawrence Davidson in Scientific American comments on the lack of critical thinking skills being taught in school:
“Informal learning environments tolerate failure better than schools. Perhaps many teachers have too little time to allow students to form and pursue their own questions and too much ground to cover in the curriculum and for standardized tests. But people must acquire this skill somewhere. Our society depends on them being able to make critical decisions, about their own medical treatment, say, or what we must do about global energy needs and demands. For that, we have a robust informal learning system that eschews grades, takes all comers, and is available even on holidays and weekends.”
So, you want people to who can think, you need to take them to environments where it is okay to ask questions and more importantly, it is okay to fail, because learning to constructively fail is one of the cornerstones of rational inquiry.




3 comments
April 22, 2013 at 8:05 am
tildeb
It’s not a question of too much or little schooling, but one of of kind: we need to ask what it is we are after with the goal of schooling. It seems to me that there is much confusion about what this goal actually is and this shows up in our classrooms: is the goal to learn skills that are employable (I call this ‘training’) OR is the goal to learn how to think well to improve the quality of our lives (I call this ‘education’)?
Until we establish what the goal of schooling is, our classrooms become microcosms of publicly funded schizophrenia where we say we want the latter but test only for the former!
And school trustees are caught between a rock and a hard place trying to create a system that addresses both and fails equally well to achieve either!
And then there’s the industrialized educational system itself that manufactures standards for qualifications and certifications unrelated to functioning well in the real world but insists (subsidized by the public) that these are necessary precursors to functioning successfully in it.
How was maintenance organized and rent ever collected by apartment superintendents, for example, before community colleges introduced courses in ‘Property Management’ and corporate owners insisted that this certification become a prerequisite for the exalted position? Or how did a security guard ever figure out how to observe and report before certification in ‘Security Guard Training’ became an employment prerequisite? Once, long ago, these ‘skills’ were obtainable in minutes by anyone not socially retarded, educated enough to able to think cogently, read and write and speak at a fundamental level, and aided (Gasp!) by on-the-job training paid for by the employer prior to the age of the industrial education. Now, however, all of us are impeded by the high costs of certification for access to minimum skill level jobs. I expect a mandatory certification course shortly in ‘Food and Drink Safety and Preparation’ for working at the local fast foods outlet and bistro. It’s amazing we are still able to walk down a sidewalk successfully without a diploma in ‘Walking on Sidewalks’.
I see much of our schooling as nothing more and nothing less than a kind of corporate welfare industry, churning out graduates with basic skills masked to be reflective of ‘skills training’ they already possessed prior to ‘graduating’ and calling this travesty an ‘education’ equivalent to those who have learned how to communicate effectively, think logically, comprehend accurately, make creative and critical links between disparate areas of overlap, and who can understand why principle must ground practice and implement changes successfully to achieve goals efficiently. Once upon a time, this is what a degree represented. Now, it represents a sizable financial investment to earn a rubber stamp of ‘educated’.. whatever that now means. When one supports a system that tries to be all things to all people, one ends up supporting a system that does nothing well.
Real life is not like any classroom I’ve been in: first, you get the punishment, and then it’s up to you to figure out what the important lesson is. A good education should provide us the means to learn many of the most important lessons real life confronts us with one step removed from that hot stove and move us much further down this learning curve.
LikeLike
April 22, 2013 at 11:24 am
The Arbourist
@tildeb
Kudos, tildeb for highlighting yet another area in which business interests have downloaded the costs to the public and then turn around and reap the benefits of their actions isn’t new, but your comment made me think about the externailizing influences you brought up.
Consider how the focus of our society (consumer capitalism) has deformed the purpose of education. One does not need to be able to think critically in order to consume, one needs only to be qualified enough to get a JOB and start fulfilling the mandate of consuming goods.
What do you think are the possible solutions – more aggressive streaming of people toward the trades and trade based colleges vs. the more academically orientated universities? A step in the right direction? Changing the direction of public education (at least with what I’ve experienced in Canada) involves struggling with a lot of bureaucratic and pedagogical inertia.
Ramen to that.
LikeLike
April 22, 2013 at 8:07 pm
Titfortat
it is okay to fail, because learning to constructively fail is one of the cornerstones of rational inquiry.
Love it!!
LikeLike