
Because Magic, taught as fact, in the curriculum is AWESOME!
Further breaking news: The Edmonton Public School Board will also remove Soylent Green Recipe Book from the Foods curriculum.
How does feculence like this happen in my school system?
“An Edmonton teen and her mother have filed a complaint with the Human Rights Commission over a high school sex education class delivered by a religious-based group. Last year, Emily Dawson, 18, took part in a two-day class delivered as part of the Career and Life Management course at McNally High School. The teenager says she was shocked by what she heard.
“Basically shaming the girls and making them gatekeepers and meanwhile making it sound like the boys had no impulse control,” she said.
The Edmonton Public School Board used the Pregnancy Care Centre to conduct the course. The centre is affiliated with Care-Net, an American based anti-abortion movement. Both groups focus on advocating abstinence from sex.
How many other little “whoopsies” does the EPSB have up its sleeve? The NRA about the value of gun control and firearm safety? Exxon on Environmental Stewardship?
What the crap?
First, lets establish what our Experts in Christian Misogyny are advocating. From Care.net –
“Care Net promotes and supports sexual abstinence until marriage among youth through its LifeWise Program. LifeWise services are available free of charge to churches, schools, and any youth-serving organizations. Care Net will also partner with parents to provide neighborhood programs in homes or at Care Net’s facility on the east side of Madison.
Care Net works to end abortion, not primarily through political action but by building a culture where every woman receives all the support she needs to welcome her child and create her own success story. By empowering women and men to make courageous, life-affirming choices, Care Net and our affiliate pregnancy centers end abortions every single day.”
Well, isn’t this just a “Grade-A” glistening block of bullshit on display. They also run Pregnancy centres to hoodwink traumatized women and baffle them with religious bullshit and obstruct them while they attempt to obtain a legal medical procedure.
What a charming bunch of folks, god bless their hearts, we are dealing with here.
So, let’s take a look at the facts of the matter just to show exactly how full of shit our christian care.net friends are and the poisonous message they brought into the Edmonton public school system.
From:
The Failure of Abstinence-only Education: minors have a right to honest talk about sex. – Published in: Sexuality and the Law Symposium, Columbia Journal of Gender and Law Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 12-62, 2006.
“Abstinence-only sex education is anything but educational. At best, it deprives students of the knowledge necessary to manage their own sexual health. At worst, it is dangerous to minors and to the public health. As the Waxman Report concluded, “[s]erious and pervasive problems with the accuracy of abstinence-only curricula may help explain why these programs have not been shown to protect adolescents from sexually transmitted diseases and why youth who pledge abstinence are significantly less likely to make informed choices about precautions when they do have sex.”18 In a society that purports to value children, the state should foster healthy, informed minors who are equipped to manage their sexual health responsibly. At the very least, the state should not encourage or support educators and programs in misleading children and promoting false, dangerous, and potentially injurious practices.”
~~~~
“In light of the potential health risks associated with these curricula, abstinence-only education cannot be justified as intending to serve any significant state interest. While the government may have an interest in encouraging abstinence in unmarried youth, its current policy is being pursued at the expense both of truth and public health. Importantly, there is no evidence that providing comprehensive sex education promotes increased sexual behavior or dilutes the message that abstinence is a preferable choice, as proponents assert.250 Furthermore, the government’s singular focus on abstinence represents an educational policy that is inconsistent with the democratic educational objective of preparing adolescents to make responsible, informed choices.”
More on efficacy of Abstinence only versus comprehensive sex education.
“Using figures from 1995-2000, Advocates for Youth (www.advocatesforyouth.org) reports that the HIV rate for Americans 15-24 is five times that of German youth of the age. The U.S. teen syphilis rate is six times higher than the Dutch; the chlamydia rate is 20 times that of French teens; and our teen gonorrhea rate is a whopping 74 times higher than the Dutch.
European programs that provide uncensored sex education and promote condom use are the reasons for this success. Contrary to what one might expect, European youth have fewer sex partners than Americans do and begin sex slightly later than Americans. What is alarming, however, is that America has the largest percentage of girls who have sex by age 15.
The U.S. also has the highest teen birth rate among 28 developed countries. According to a UNICEF study, less than 10 per 100,000 teenage girls in Korea, Japan, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Sweden gave birth in 2001, whereas 52 American teens per 100,000 did.”
More on the failure of Abstinence Only Education – Here, Here, Here, here… Let us conclude then that our dear Christian Misogynists are the engineers of the fail-train; happily throwing more coal into the fire as they move full speed ahead and with Jesus and Ignorance at their side, they are unstoppable.
We should get back to Kelly and Emily and their experience with these professional dispensers of mendacity.
Kathy Dawson says she tried to pull her daughter Emily out of the class for the second day. But she says the school informed her that Emily had to take the class in order to pass her course. So she joined her daughter in the classroom. A single mother, Dawson said she was shocked what students were told about families like hers.
“Well, that our children are prone to depression, suicide, juvenile delinquency,” she said.
The remarks also surprised her daughter. “It’s not something that you hear every day where you’re getting bashed for being in a single-parent home.”
Kathy Dawson was also upset the class appeared to focus on values instead of science.”
See. Seeeeeeeeee?!? This is what happens when you let this sort of religious malevolent altiloquence into the secular classroom. Shaming single parent families, fuck-ya god hates you – and lets not forget about the eternally burning homosexuals…
“I have a friend that is a lesbian and she was asking what would happen if she didn’t want to stay abstinent and then the educator said, ‘We’re not here to talk about that,’” Dawson said.
Yes, telling young children that they’ll burn seems a little out of place in Canada (and the norm for secular societies), so we’ll just ignore your question instead. The nice people at Care Net are so full of love, tolerance, and compassion.
Full marks to Kathy Dawson for taking action to get these people out of the school system.
The Alberta Human Rights Commission has now accepted the Dawsons’ complaint.
“I’m training up my kids to respect science and demand science in their education,” Kathy Dawson said. “So this is a long haul, and I’m fully prepared to take it all the way.”
This is pretty much a slam dunk. Is religious bunk allowed in the classroom? Yes/No If the answer is yes, then the leaders of secular school board will have some explaining to do.
The EPSB took action –
the EPSB wrote that it had a registered nurse observe one of the presentations unannounced and found the information “met our standards and expectations on every level” but that it would still look for new presenters for the next year.
“Having said that, we’ve heard a lot of concerns expressed from the public over the last several days about guest speakers invited to present on the topic of sexual health education,” the board wrote.
“We are asking our schools in the fall to use different presenters so that we can continue this conversation, and focus on meeting the needs of students and parents.”
Well the school board doesn’t have its head entirely up its ass. Woo!
[Source]
[Source]



20 comments
July 16, 2014 at 5:46 am
roughseasinthemed
The figures about the US are fascinating. So when I’m reading (crap) YA novels, why are they all virgins in their teens, early twenties, and just waiting for the right man. Another mythical American dream?
People, ie both boys and girls, need sensible education about how to conduct relationships as adults. I sure as hell didn’t get it, so it’s total fluke I’m not a statistic.
Sexual abstinence is a crazy theory for sex education. It wants throwing out of the window. Responsible sex is what matters.
Hope we get to see a different report from you about EPSB next term.
LikeLike
July 16, 2014 at 7:48 am
tildeb
Abstinence-only driving lessons – who needs a car? – should also improve road safety. Yup: there’s another clever plan we’ll call ‘edjewkayshun’. We’ll learn them kids good.
LikeLike
July 16, 2014 at 8:01 am
syrbal-labrys
Reblogged this on Experiential Pagan and commented:
Trying this a second time…the religious bill of goods makes true the comment about “buyer beware!”
LikeLike
July 16, 2014 at 8:02 am
syrbal-labrys
Actually, I think “magic” as I personally refer to it, is LESS harmful than this misogynistic brew of bullshit and wishful thinking. (tho’ it might be ok to water strawberry plants with in a pinch)
LikeLike
July 16, 2014 at 8:26 am
The Arbourist
@RSITM
Partly, but I think that women’s sexuality in so much of media is just dripping with patriarchal nonsense that goes way back. How does chaste = good woman?? It’s like a zombie meme that won’t die (thankyou religion for continuing to propagate toxic shite).
Absopositively. Educators need to present evidence based material in a reasonable way to children – no ooga-booga, no stereotypes and no religious hootenanny.
See this and many other policies that right wing ‘value-voters’ seem to laud despite what has been shown to work.
I’ll keep my ear to the ground on this one. :)
LikeLike
July 16, 2014 at 8:28 am
The Arbourist
@Syrbal
In a secular school system the facts have to matter. I’m still gobsmacked over how anyone thought that this was a good idea.
LikeLike
July 16, 2014 at 8:33 am
The Arbourist
@Tildeb
LOL :)
LikeLike
July 16, 2014 at 6:32 pm
Rob F
You might be interested in the typical use rate of abstinence from Heather Corinna of Scarleteen. Basically, about 42.5% – 50%.
For comparison (source=Planned Parenthood), the method parents use, calendar, is 24% and withdrawal (ibid) is 27%.
LikeLike
July 16, 2014 at 11:59 pm
Jymn
It’s disturbing how little difference there is between misogynists and feminists. They both hate the opposite sex. No more so than DWR, whose sexism would make any man blush. Women should be alarmed – DWR’s hatred of men is too reminiscent of the 70’s when feminism started to lose its lustre over its puritanism.
LikeLike
July 17, 2014 at 12:06 am
bleatmop
Oh snap Arb, you just got told. I didn’t know you were such a man hater.
LikeLike
July 17, 2014 at 12:08 am
Jymn
bleatmop, how would you know?
LikeLike
July 17, 2014 at 12:21 am
Jymn
Actually, I’ve been trying to make this point since I was kicked off the feminist site, Sister Sage’s. If you don’t make an effort to talk with (not fundamentalists) but men and women you know, nothing will improve. You expect men to lead; we’re sick of it. DWR, why don’t you take a chance? Be open. Be brave. Lead a new movement of men and women working together. That’s not a lot to ask, unless you really do hate men. Stop whining – take the reigns.
LikeLike
July 17, 2014 at 6:56 am
tildeb
Here’s the same po-mo meme at work yet again… by Jymn this time: Arb’s non misogyny is really another kind of misogyny. We see this meme at work all the time, where the non belief of atheists is really another kind of religious belief, non militancy of social critics another kind of social militancy, and so on.
One would be too optimistic to think that so many willing critics of equality – and those who advocate it most strongly and clearly and consistently – might clue into the obvious: that a non bicycle really isn’t another kind of bicycle, a non fish really isn’t another kind of fish, and so on. But what’s obvious to the clear-eyed and rational among us seems to elude these ‘special’ people like Jymn is the fact that they seem to require another kind of dictionary than the common one to facilitate this linguistic reversal to support their ever-so-clever non-insightful ‘insight’.
This should be a clue as to its truth value…
LikeLike
July 17, 2014 at 8:14 am
The Arbourist
@RobF
Thank you for the additional information. It is never too long before someone who believes in abstinence will come around and will need to ignore statistical datum that contradicts their worldview. :)
LikeLike
July 17, 2014 at 8:21 am
The Arbourist
@Jymn
Accurately describing the social gradients of power in society and critiquing them is sexist? Dare I say m?sand1c? LoL forever. :)
July 17, 2014 at 8:23 am
The Arbourist
@Bleatmop
I know eh? *sips coffee out of male skull coffee mug* :) Always the last one to know around here.
LikeLike
July 17, 2014 at 8:25 am
The Arbourist
@Jymn
Jymn For your edification, there is a fine stable of writers here at DWR, and Bleatmop happens to be one of them.
LikeLike
July 17, 2014 at 8:46 am
The Arbourist
@Jymn
Jymn, women have been talking to men for centuries about the sort of basic rights and expectations they *should* have by default. Nothing in society is freely given, marginalized groups in society must organize, band together and take what is rightfully theirs from the powers of the status-quo. See getting the Suffrage, the civil rights movement, trade unionism, the end of Apartheid etc. Conditions must be won through struggle because the dominant class almost never cedes power willingly.
Your rhetoric not mine. If anything, I expect men, as a class, to accommodate to the view of treating women as full human beings and understand that dismantling the patriarchal structures in society is the first step in this program.
Taking a dudely prescription on how to fix the dude problem in society….hmmm. Err…no thanks. The weight of centuries of oppression and degradation don’t magically fall away under the titular banner of “Women and Men – Working together” – we are way past that stage of attempting to fix things (see the sexual ‘revolution’).
Women need to continue to organize socially and politically in order to dismantle the patriarchal structures of society; those same structures empower the status-quo, and thus struggle is inevitable.
Still not buying into the characterizations you’re laying down, nor your perceived solutions.
Check. Thanks for your input.
LikeLike
July 17, 2014 at 8:48 am
The Arbourist
@Tildeb
Fascinating the way the wyrm turns in trying to justify systemic inequality.
Very well stated, it’s almost like you’ve had to deal with this sort of argument before. :)
LikeLike
July 17, 2014 at 2:15 pm
bleatmop
@ Arb – And here I always thought that was a novelty skull. Well, I may be the last to the party but at least I’m the funnest guest ;)
LikeLike