Star Trek writers have fun with the technology in their universe. CGP gray takes a look at some of the issues that transporters bring to the table.
Your opinions…
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- Epstein files: The 1st tranche of documents have been released. Here's what we've learned
- Military espionage case started with claims that Postmedia journalist is linked to Russia: sources
- U.S. launches 'vengeance' strikes against ISIS targets in Syria, Hegseth says
- CBC photojournalists reveal their most compelling images of 2025
- Officer shot as police respond to fence dispute in Welland, Ont., people urged to shelter in place
- CBC News: The National | Toronto man facing terrorism charges
- Alberta Next panel recommends referendums on immigration, leaving Canada Pension Plan
- Toronto man charged with terrorism, funding ISIS and attempted kidnappings
- Akwesasne parents outraged after photos circulate of 'time out box' in school
- How bad could this flu season get? Here are answers to your influenza questions
Posts I Like
Blogs I Follow
bleatmop
Mystro
Dead Wild Roses 
3 comments
March 16, 2016 at 7:33 am
john zande
We need Jonathan Livingston Seagull technology… just know you’re already there.
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 16, 2016 at 2:58 pm
The Arbourist
@JZ
That takes a lot of the fun out it, don’t you think? I mean your suggestin would mean that refribulating the tachyon matrix and other stuff would be completely unnecessary.
Future ST episodes would be shorter by half if we couldn’t future speak about the transporters. :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 17, 2016 at 9:39 pm
bleatmop
This just made Star Trek a lot more badass!
LikeLiked by 1 person