Yet more evidence that identity politics is bad for women.
“Pregnant woman” is not an identity. It is a social reality. A pregnant woman’s ever-contracting rights – whether she can choose to end this pregnancy, whether she will risk imprisonment for drinking too much, whether she will lose her job, whether she will be murdered by her partner – can only be seen through the filter of her inferior social status: that of woman. She neither chooses nor identifies with this status and it matters that the restrictions it places on her and others be fully acknowledged. Hundreds of women died today because of the way in which pregnancy intersects with their political and social status as women. The term “pregnant people” denies them the specificity of their deaths and masks the cause.
What gender-neutral pregnancy campaigning has achieved is wholly negative, making it impossible to articulate why there exists a class of people who are not granted full sovereignty over what lies beneath their own skin. It has located the abortion debate (which should not be a debate at all) back where conservatives want it: on the status of the foetus, not that of the woman. It has allowed the misogynist left to consolidate their definition of woman as “passive fantasy girl with tits” as opposed to “person with independent physical functions, emotions and needs.” Above all, it has created the illusion of an opt-out to being placed in the inferior sex class. Well, there isn’t, at least not until you can be bothered to challenge the fundamental idea that half the human race is inferior (oh, but that’s so much harder than messing about with words!).”
2 comments
March 27, 2017 at 12:40 pm
roughseasinthemed
I’m fascinated why no one ever comments on these sort of posts. yeah, likey likey. But say, anything?
Apart from the odd few women.
(And Mak, Tildeb I don’t mean you)
A little support would be nice from the nice powerful menz though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 27, 2017 at 2:47 pm
The Arbourist
@RSitM
Well, speaking from the men folk’s perspective, the sort of tomfoolery that is going on doesn’t really have a negative effect on them or their rights.
Furthermore, weighing in on the topic might mean exposure to the neoliberal left which is strong on feels, but light on useful theory and praxis. Starting the I’m offended train isn’t the happiest place to be, and again with issue that doesn’t directly rock their world the CBA comes down in favour of not making waves.
I’m not speaking for anyone in particular, just speculating.
And really, who wants to be seen supporting effective feminism? :)
LikeLiked by 1 person