You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Education’ category.

“Faith taints or at worst removes our curiosity about the world, what we should value, and what type of life we should lead. Faith replaces wonder with epistemological arrogance disguised as false humility. Faith immutably alters the starting conditions for inquiry by uprooting a hunger to know and sowing a warrantless confidence.”
-Peter Boghossian
“I Investigated the UK’s Most CENSORIOUS Campus (4K)” delves into the atmosphere of one of the UK’s universities known for its restrictive policies on free speech. The video, by journalist Andrew Gold, investigates how this institution has become a focal point for debates on censorship, examining incidents where speakers have been banned or events canceled due to their potentially controversial content.
It discusses the tension between ensuring a safe space for all students and the traditional university ethos of open debate and inquiry, highlighting specific cases where academic freedom has been challenged by student activism or university policies.
The narrative captures both the perspectives of those advocating for more censorship to protect vulnerable groups and those who see it as an erosion of free expression.
Postmodern politics, characterized by skepticism towards grand narratives, relativism, and the deconstruction of traditional political concepts, has faced several critiques.
Here are three main points against postmodern politics:
Relativism and Lack of Objective Truths:
Critics argue that postmodern politics promotes a form of relativism where all viewpoints are considered equally valid, regardless of their empirical or logical foundations. This can lead to an erosion of objective standards for truth, making it difficult to address issues like misinformation or to establish common ground for public policy. Critics contend that without some acceptance of objective truths, political discourse can devolve into chaos where every opinion is as good as any other, undermining rational debate and decision-making.
Fragmentation and Identity Politics:
Postmodernism’s emphasis on identity often leads to politics that prioritize group identities over broader, unifying national or humanistic goals. This can result in excessive fragmentation of society into smaller, often conflicting groups, each with its own narrative or set of demands. Critics argue this approach can exacerbate social divisions, encourage tribalism, and make governance more challenging as it becomes harder to forge consensus or enact policies that benefit the majority or society as a whole.
Ineffectiveness in Addressing Large-Scale Issues:
By questioning the validity of grand narratives and traditional power structures, postmodern politics can struggle to mobilize large-scale, collective action necessary for tackling major issues like climate change, global poverty, or pandemics. The deconstruction of overarching ideologies or solutions can lead to paralysis or inaction because no single strategy or narrative is seen as universally applicable or legitimate. Critics argue this can leave societies without the necessary tools or unity to address global or even national challenges effectively.
These criticisms suggest that while postmodernism can offer valuable insights into the complexities of identity, power, and knowledge, its application in politics might sometimes hinder rather than help in achieving cohesive, effective governance and social progress.
-
Behavioral Analysis Interview (BAI):
-
This initial phase involves a non-accusatory interview where the investigator assesses the subject’s behavior, verbal responses, and body language to determine if the person is likely deceptive or truthful. The focus is on observing signs like posture, eye contact, and verbal cues.
-
-
Nine Steps of Interrogation:
-
1. Direct, Positive Confrontation: The interviewer directly confronts the suspect with the evidence or belief of their guilt.
-
2. Theme Development: The interrogator offers moral justifications or themes for the crime, trying to minimize the suspect’s moral culpability.
-
3. Handling Denials: Denials are interrupted to prevent the suspect from gaining confidence or solidifying their denials.
-
4. Overcoming Objections: The interrogator counters any objections or reasons given by the suspect for not committing the crime.
-
5. Procurement of the Suspect’s Attention: The focus is shifted to listening to the interrogator rather than formulating their own defense.
-
6. Handling the Suspect’s Passive Mood: When the suspect becomes quiet or resigned, the interrogator takes this as a sign to push forward.
-
7. Presenting an Alternative Question: Offering two choices, one more socially acceptable than the other, both implying guilt, e.g., “Did you steal because you needed the money or because you were angry?”
-
8. Having the Suspect Orally Relate Details of the Offense: Encouraging the suspect to admit to details of the crime.
-
9. Converting an Oral Confession to a Written One: Ensuring the confession is documented, often with the suspect writing or signing a statement.
-
-
The technique has been criticized for leading to false confessions, particularly because of its psychologically coercive methods. Critics argue that it can pressure innocent people into confessing due to the stress, isolation, and manipulation involved in the process.
-
There’s also a debate over its scientific validity, especially regarding the behavioral analysis for detecting deception, which many experts now consider unreliable.
-
Reform and Alternatives: Due to these criticisms, some jurisdictions have moved away from the Reid Technique, advocating for or adopting more evidence-based, less coercive methods like the PEACE model (Preparation and Planning, Engage and Explain, Account, Closure, Evaluate) used in places like the UK.
The problems run deem down South. Sadly, we are not much better here in Canada.
Sometimes you need to start at 101 level. Let’s do that today.


Your opinions…