Oh, just shaking my head at this one. Watch the trans identified male dig a nice hole for himself as he debates with Meghan Murphy and other gender critical feminists.
I have laws enshrined in society now that protects my male delusions of gender, fear me female! Of course, cue the defence against the world of facts and reality.
Julie Rei makes assertions that are not based in fact. Watch how quickly Julie gets shut down.
Whoo-whee! Now there is some goal-post shifting at its finest. Shift away Julie, I’m pretty sure Gender Rebel is not going to brook any of your shit.
Lol-cakes! The idea that you can adopt the patriarchally approved gender stereotypes and that somehow makes you a woman is not only foolish, it is appalling. Bullshit patriarchal expectations are what radical feminists fight against because, you guessed it, they hurt women (and men).
In the last panel Scott rightly points out the irony of Morgane’s position and PinkPussyHatRadFemTERF delivers the Coup de grâce doing what radfems do best naming the problem and identifying how to counter it.
This BS sadly is happening in my country. I’m so very glad that we have people who are standing up to the trans-cult when they make assertions contrary to reality. Oh hey, let me get that definition mentioned in the twitter stream.
Pluralistic Ignorance – “In social psychology, pluralistic ignorance is a situation in which a majority of group members privately reject a norm, but incorrectly assume that most others accept it, and therefore go along with it.[1] This is also described as “no one believes, but everyone thinks that everyone believes”. In short, pluralistic ignorance is a bias about a social group, held by that social group.[2][3]
Pluralistic ignorance may help to explain the bystander effect.[4] If no-one acts, onlookers may believe others believe action is incorrect, and may therefore themselves refrain from acting.”
6 comments
February 1, 2018 at 9:47 am
lovetruthcourage
Time to lobby against allowing trannies to change their identity documents. Stand up for objective reality, Canada!
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 1, 2018 at 3:11 pm
Miep
Aside from people with actual genuine intersex disorders, women have or at one time had wombs and birth canals and clitorises. This is the case whether or not we are fertile. Men may have medically induced breasts and they may have surgically created orifices, but they never have wombs or birth canals or clitorises. Whole different set of parts.
In other news, water is wet.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 1, 2018 at 3:13 pm
Miep
I would be okay wih violent felons not being allowed to change their names. Gender marker changes were originally to accommodate people with full SRS. Extending them to just anyone is nuts.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 1, 2018 at 3:53 pm
The Arbourist
@ Miep
So much this. I’m still quite astounded by how much traction claims that go against basic knowledge have gotten.
The whole star trek the next generation episode in which picard is being interrogated come to mind.
How many times do we need to say that there are 5 lights, when there actually are just 5 lights?
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 1, 2018 at 3:57 pm
Miep
Humans are remarkably susceptible to suggestion, especially when reinforced by groups.
LikeLiked by 3 people
February 1, 2018 at 4:02 pm
Miep
And the fertility argument is just dumb. Being fertile doesn’t control your sex any more than losing limbs controls your humanity. The ever-present conceit is that damaging an individual of one sex makes them the other sex. If a man has a vasectomy, is he now a woman?
LikeLiked by 2 people