You are currently browsing the monthly archive for May 2025.
TL;DR – Judge positions and arguments based on their merit, not the political stripe of who happens to be saying it.
A recent review by the Department of Health and Human Services explores the evidence and best practices for treating pediatric gender dysphoria, a condition where children and teens experience distress related to their sex or its social expectations. As more young people identify as transgender or nonbinary, the U.S. has widely adopted the “gender-affirming” care model, which includes social affirmation, puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries. However, this approach is under scrutiny internationally due to its experimental nature and potential risks, prompting this review to clarify the evidence for policymakers, clinicians, and families.
Background: Rising Diagnoses, Diverging Approaches
The review highlights a sharp increase in gender dysphoria diagnoses among youth, with the U.S. favoring a “gender-affirming” model that prioritizes medical interventions. This approach, originally developed for adults with poor outcomes, was extended to minors before robust outcome data emerged. Internationally, there’s no consensus—some countries, like the UK, have restricted puberty blockers and hormones for minors, citing insufficient evidence of safety and efficacy, and now emphasize psychosocial support instead.
Evidence Review: Weak Benefits, Known Risks
An “umbrella review” of systematic reviews found that evidence supporting the benefits of medical treatments—like improved psychological outcomes or quality of life—is of very low quality, suggesting reported benefits may not hold up. Evidence on harms is limited, partly due to short follow-ups and poor tracking, but established risks include infertility, sexual dysfunction, bone density issues, cognitive effects, cardiovascular and metabolic disorders, psychiatric conditions, surgical complications, and regret. This gap between uncertain benefits and clearer risks calls for caution.
Clinical Realities: Guidelines and Practice Under Fire
Influential U.S. guidelines from WPATH and the Endocrine Society lack rigor, with WPATH accused of suppressing systematic reviews and loosening standards under political pressure. Many U.S. gender clinics bypass even these permissive guidelines, often limiting mental health assessments to brief sessions. Whistleblowers and detransitioners report serious risks and harms, but their concerns are frequently ignored, revealing a disconnect between practice and evidence-based care.
Ethics and Alternatives: Caution and Psychotherapy
Ethically, while patients can refuse treatments, they aren’t entitled to unproven ones, and clinicians should avoid interventions with disproportionate risks. The review finds no evidence that medical transition reduces suicide rates, which are low and tied more to comorbidities than gender dysphoria itself. Psychotherapy emerges as a noninvasive option, with systematic reviews showing no adverse effects, yet it’s understudied due to misconceptions. The review urges more research and a careful approach to pediatric care.
AI is giving Moore’s Law law a run for its money.
1 Month (June 2025)
Over the next month, AI advancements are likely to focus on incremental improvements in existing models and broader accessibility. Companies like xAI, OpenAI, and Anthropic will continue optimizing large language models for efficiency, reducing computational costs, and enhancing performance in tasks like natural language processing, code generation, and image analysis. More seamless integration of AI tools into consumer platforms, such as enhanced voice assistants or improved content recommendation systems, is expected. Regulatory discussions, particularly in the EU and US, will gain momentum, with early frameworks for AI safety and ethics shaping deployment strategies.
3 Months (August 2025)
By August 2025, AI systems are expected to exhibit more robust multimodal capabilities, combining text, image, and possibly audio processing. Models like Grok 3 may see expanded features in real-time information synthesis. Increased adoption in industries like healthcare (e.g., diagnostic tools) and education (e.g., personalized learning platforms) is likely. Open-source AI frameworks may mature, enabling smaller organizations to deploy sophisticated models. Stricter guidelines addressing data privacy and algorithmic bias will emerge, fostering trust but potentially slowing some deployments.
6 Months (November 2025)
By November 2025, AI could demonstrate improved reasoning abilities, tackling complex problems in scientific research or logistics with greater autonomy. Advancements in reinforcement learning may optimize supply chains or energy grids. Consumer-facing AI, like voice modes, might expand to new platforms with more natural interactions. Global ethical AI standards will likely solidify, addressing issues like deepfakes. Developments will be driven by increased computational power and collaborations, though challenges like energy consumption and geopolitical tensions may arise.
Reference List for AI Development Forecast 2025
- McKinsey & Company. (2024). The state of AI in 2024: Gen AI adoption accelerates as organizations pursue value. McKinsey & Company.
- Provides insights into AI adoption trends, including multimodal capabilities and industry applications like healthcare and education.
- Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. (2024). AI Index Report 2024. Stanford University.
- Offers data on AI performance improvements, computational efficiency, and global regulatory efforts.
- European Commission. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Act. European Union.
- Details the EU’s regulatory framework for AI, influencing global safety and ethics standards.
- Gartner. (2024). Top Strategic Technology Trends for 2025. Gartner, Inc.
- Highlights AI-driven automation, multimodal AI, and reinforcement learning applications in logistics and energy.
- World Association of News Publishers. (2024). Ethical AI in Media: Addressing Deepfakes and Misinformation. WAN-IFRA.
- Discusses emerging standards for combating AI-generated misinformation.
- IEEE Spectrum. (2024). The Race for General Intelligence: AI’s Next Frontier. IEEE.
- Explores advancements in reasoning and general intelligence in AI systems.
- xAI. (2024). Grok 3 Product Documentation. xAI. Retrieved from https://x.ai/grok.
- Provides details on Grok 3’s capabilities, including DeepSearch and voice mode, informing consumer AI trends.
Note: Some references are based on projected trends from 2024 sources, as specific 2025 data is not yet available. All sources were accessed for their relevance to AI development, regulation, and application trends as of May 18, 2025.
The Carney Liberals have cast themselves as vigilant guardians of democratic accountability, sounding alarms about the creeping threat of right-wing fascism undermining Canada’s institutions. However, their decision to prorogue Parliament in 2025 reveals a stark hypocrisy, as it silenced legislative debate and evaded scrutiny at a pivotal moment. While they might argue this was a pragmatic response to a crisis requiring a reset of the legislative agenda, the lack of a clear, specific rationale and their history of using prorogation to sidestep controversies suggest political expediency over necessity. This move, which stalls the democratic process they claim to protect, casts doubt on their commitment to transparency and accountability.
Their refusal to table a federal budget in 2025 further erodes their credibility as champions of responsible governance. By skipping this cornerstone of fiscal accountability, they’ve left Canadians without clarity on economic priorities during a time of global uncertainty, prioritizing political maneuvering over public trust. The Liberals might counter that global economic volatility demanded delaying the budget to ensure fiscal prudence, but their failure to provide interim fiscal updates or a timeline for a future budget undermines this claim. Such an omission hampers Parliament’s oversight role, contradicting their stated dedication to open and accountable governance.
The Liberals’ warnings about authoritarian threats ring hollow when their own actions weaken the democratic norms they vow to uphold. Proroguing Parliament and bypassing a budget are not mere procedural hiccups but deliberate retreats from accountability that echo the authoritarian tendencies they condemn. They may argue that these steps are minor compared to global populist threats, but this defense falters when their governance choices invite skepticism about their motives. For a party campaigning on safeguarding democracy, the Carney Liberals’ actions—prorogation and budget avoidance—reveal a troubling disconnect between their rhetoric and reality, fueling doubts about their true priorities.
The Humane Society kitty lottery came through in spades for me. Meet Quincy, a energetic yet loving fellow who is quite passionate about food and looking out the window. :)
bleatmop
Mystro
The Arbourist
Dead Wild Roses 
Your opinions…