You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Queer Stupidity’ tag.
This article is written by Nicky Reid who in her first sentence declares their identity as a “Queer pro-lie anarchist”. I think that if you happen to be writing an piece to be published, wouldn’t it be better to let your thoughts and ideas carry your message rather than stating which camp you happen to belong to?
I’m surprised/not-surprised that Counterpunch would publish this person’s work, but there was a time when CP was about giving a voice to intelligent authors who had serious arguments that added breadth and depth to many an important topic. Instead what we are presented with is scattered unhinged whinging about how terrible everything is and that the only solution is burning it all down. A small sample:
“Me too. I say that Queer people and our allies on the left start putting our priorities into challenging these scumbags to put up or shut up by thinking big, acting small, and weaponizing our own communities against their institutions.
The best revenge against judicial tyranny is secession and we’ve seen this theory wielded with fantastic results in the form of sanctuary states and sanctuary cities. Local governments who simply refuse to comply with the feds on issues as far-ranging as gun rights and marijuana have exposed their powers for the hopped-up illusions that they really are and rendered them totally impotent in the face of communities who quite simply resist being governed by any authority figure they didn’t vote for.
Let’s take this ethic to the next level by organizing intentional communities across the map around shared ideals like communes and gayborhoods and turning them into sanctuaries from any power that exists outside them. Let’s create a quilt work of Queer autonomous zones and feminist autonomous zones and Black Power autonomous zones and Boogaloo autonomous zones and polygamist autonomous zones and tweaker autonomous zones.”
Really? Because the public good is well served by the destruction of the institutions that maintain the public good? Because creating ‘autonomous zones’ isn’t a recipe for chaos and lawlessness that will hurt everyone not ready to go all in on the “bloody tooth and nail” routine?
Tearing all of society down because *you* inside your bullshit queerness are having an ‘unhappy’ is insanity. Calm the fuck down.
The same goes for you Counterpunch, calm down and stop printing such aggressively stupid articles.
This except taken from Stock’s eassy on substack about the “The Family Sex Show”.
If the grift fits run with it I guess. This is one of the many problems with the all the manufactured identities running around out there – the cache and relevance given to them has no direct tie to their value in society. ‘My made up words make me important’ should not be an serious metric in a society concerned with epistemological validity.
Remember when you could just go study a subject and not have to deal with the inane bullshit outside said field (most fields have enough internal BS going on). Not anymore. Now you can get dial your oppression into serious subjects and feel good correcting others when they mistake your clownshow (academic work) as satire.
Ah, violent males expressing how violent they wish to be toward women who oppose their gender-magic. The previous link is to the abstract and transcript. This from the department of Gender Studies at the London School of Economics. Did you need an example of how far the Humanities in academia has fallen? Take a gander.
“Let us harness this parasitic imaginary and suck the cis out of feminism. Let us be the endemic. Let us exist as the evil twin to queer theory, and let us 14 bleed it dry for all it can offer us. Chu is wrong: trans* is more than ancillary notion to queer. But do we have to depart from queer entirely? Is trans* even 15 fucking here yet?16 If TERFs think trans* is an endemic threat to feminism, let us be the threat to feminism. We are the endemic, the viral, the toxic onslaught of ideology that attacks the very core of what you hold dear. We go unnoticed, right up until the moment they scream for mercy. Am I a threat to you? Do I send chills down your spine?”
Picture this: I hold a knife to your throat and spit my transness into your ear. Does that turn you on? Are you scared? I sure fucking hope so.
Go to sexmatters.org for the full story on what this crank has been saying.
The ‘inclusivity’ stupid train just keeps on chugging along over at ShoutoutJMU. Not an argument or even a shade of nuance is to be found there. Just dull eyed listless opprobrium meant to keep people in line and critical analysis at bay.
It is an insipid shit show, and we all know by now that the RPOJ is a vehicle build specifically for shit-shows. But let us not tarry further – let’s see what this “feminist” resource has to offer on the subject of the intersection between radical feminism and queer politics.
—–
“Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists are one of the worst kinds of people out there. You’re not a feminist, so you’ve been canceled.”
Wow. Such insight, much praxis, good enlightening… Starting your thoughts off with insults and slander always sets the stage for a charitable, honest, and productive discussion.
The only aspect missing is a strawman caricature of your opponents position to savagely beat and make your fellow besotted acolytes feel powerful….
“Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists. These are “feminists” who consistently choose to leave trans folks OUT of the conversation.”
Radical feminism, or effective feminism, is the project to liberate women (Adult human females) from the patriarchal constructs of society. Generally speaking radical feminist theory and praxis revolves around identifying social structures in society that are oppressing women, raising the consciousness of women being affected by said structures, then analyzing and deconstructing said oppressive edifices with the goal of the emancipation of women from patriarchy.
A helpful insight provided free of charge – One of the primary axis of oppression women experience is based on their sex. The means of this oppression is the construct of gender which dictates and imposes the inferior role for women in society.
The radical feminist solution is working toward the abolition of gender in society, because the of the harmful nature of the construct for both women and men.
Radical Feminists are therefore about the liberation of women in society, and centring women in that struggle. The activist world is big, if you’re not feeling like you’re the primary concern in Feminism (the struggle for female liberation) then start your own damn movement and stop co-opting feminism proper for goals that do not focus on the female struggle against patriarchy.
Also since trans identified females (Tif’s) are in fact, female, they are subject to the same sex based oppression all females face and indeed are included under the aegis of effective female-centric feminism.
“Why? Because, well they suck.”
Queer theorists and the SJW ilk are just full of profoundly deep explanations for their assertions. To be fair though, they are gangbusters at circular arguments, but that’s still coming; so hold on to your hats folks, the circus ride of abjectly plaintive idiocy has yet to crest.
“The idea is that “transwomen” aren’t really women because they “grew up men” and still “receive all the benefits of the patriarchy”.
Trans women, or trans identified males (Tim’s) are not women. Male socialization is unavoidable for natal males born into our society. You’ll have about as much success as renouncing your white privilege if you happen to be born white. In other words – your personal subjective solution to the dominant ethos of society is fucking irrelevant.
“In turn, they use the same rhetoric with transmen “who grew up women” and are now “trying to receive the benefits of the patriarchy”
They actually don’t. It is risible enough to deny the potency and ubiquitous nature of male socialization, but to gloss over the fact that much of radical feminism is built on material, factual, reality, is really quite egregious. Furthermore since TiF’s are female they are indeed most welcome in effective feminism.
“Either way, someway, all transpeople contribute to the patriarchy and therefore, do not deserve feminism.”
Said no radical feminist ever. But its damn the torpedoes and full steam ahead when beating the the crap out of the straw feminist bogywoman you’ve created.
That was honestly hard to write.”
It must have been hard to write considering the sheer magnitude of bullshit per square centimetre demonstrated.
“Transwomen are women.
Transmen are men.”
It wouldn’t be a ‘woke’ SJW article without at least one thought terminating cliche, combined of course, with a circular definition of what a woman is. (i.e. What is a woman, a woman is anyone who says they are woman [but what is a woman…??]. – You can’t define a term by itself.)
Sorry, not sorry, but the above statements are not arguments, they are strictures meant to discriminate between the ideologically sound and the unwashed. They are endpoints meant to discourage questioning and silence dissent. You many fuck off now with your thinly veiled ‘woke’ misogyny at your earliest convenience.
“They aren’t “men who grew up to be women and women who grew up to be men”. They’re people who sometimes grew up in the wrong bodies.”
Wrong bodies or not, biological sex is immutable.
“Don’t even get me started with NB people. OOMPH. The DISRESPECT.”
So we’ll combat the evil of the gender binary by creating another false binary? Seems to be layering another layer of oppression into a already terribly oppressive system. Woo, the progress…
“Rhetoric from TERFs has been used for years to silence people. But right now, me and everyone else in the gendery and queer community are amused…”
Wow, winning the oppression Olympics must feel soooo fucking good.
You and the ‘gendery-queery’ community continue to avoid speaking and acting on the elephant in the room: the epidemic of patriarchally endorsed male violence. Violent males continue to kill women and trans people at alarming rate, pretty much without repercussion and you’re banging on about experiencing repression at the hands of the Radical Feminists?
Get back to me when you start tackling the root of the problem instead of whinging on about a small collection of females who are rightly calling bullshit your inconsistent, misogynistic, and female erasing ideology.
“Some folks are discussing… […]”
Skipping tangential meanderings/virtue signalling.
“TERFs are exclusive, and demand their turf space. But, people like me aren’t going to let them have it.”
The struggle against male power is age old, and the misogyny exhibited here is nothing new. Women will rise, women will struggle, and women will prevail against patriarchy in whatever form it happens to take. Thankyouverymuch.
“Even when TERFs include race or ability, their sole goal to deconstruct the patriarchy and battle gender stereotypes and fight for equality of gender….is counter intuitive. They’re not fighting for all women.”
Radical feminists are struggling for female liberation. Gender is a toxic hierarchy by definition, and thus, no semblance of “equality” can be struck within the system.
The only counterintuitive aspect of your statement is attempting to lump males into a movement that strives for female liberation. It makes about as much sense as asking for management’s opinions on how to run a union strike.
“Why should I contribute to feminist conversations… […]”
I’m solidly with you on that one, because other than creating a writable RPOJ-moment, the value of your contributions (at least to the feminist movement) approaches zero.
bleatmop
Mystro
The Arbourist
Dead Wild Roses 
Your opinions…