You are currently browsing The Arbourist’s articles.
Author Archive
When is Speech Violence? – Wittgenstein’s Language Game
September 6, 2017 in Politics, Social Science | Tags: Definitions, When is Speech Violence, Wittgenstein, words | by The Arbourist | 9 comments
Interesting article from the folks over at JSTOR.
“According to Willinsky, “The schooled representation of meaning sets language in the hands of those who hold the proper definitions.” In other words, appeals to the dictionary serve a political purpose; they preserve existing power structures, and fortify the way things are at the expense of the way things can be.
It can appear trivial to expend so much energy on worrying about how we speak, because speech seems less tangible than physical action. But definitions always matter. In the judicial system, for example, they are key in assigning blame. The “reasonable person” standard is applied in self-defense cases to determine culpability; in this context, “reasonable” means average, ordinary. As legal scholar Jody David Armour writes in Negrophobia and Reasonable Racism, this definition of reasonable “takes the merely typical and contingent and presents it as truth and morality, objectively construed,” a pretty low bar for justice. Consider how a “rational person” test or an “omniscient person” test might change the meaning of criminality.
Similarly, there was a time in the American South when blackness, that thing that determined where one could eat, drink, and sit, was codified into law as having “one drop” of black blood. And migrants fleeing violence in Central America are rarely granted asylum in the United States because of the legal definition of “refugee.” There are profound consequences from definitions, and they should not be ceded to the staff of a reference book.
Even words without legal import can hold incredible power. Speech can’t bruise skin, but it can break a spirit. Is a feeling any less real because it happens “under the hood?” Is heartbreak not real pain? Why do we describe hurtful words as a punch to the gut or a slap to the face? For so long, the free speech debate has been built upon an incoherent premise: that speech is powerful enough to solve social ills, but can’t inflict as much damage as a fist.
When is speech violence? It depends on how we define it. If we define violence as a physical act, then speech is never violence. If we choose to define violence as causing harm to a person, then speech is often violence. If we choose to define violence as intentionally causing harm, then sometimes speech is violence.
If there is to be one takeaway from the work of Wittgenstein, it’s that nothing is essential in language. He spent his entire life feeling around for the atoms of speech, only to discover that he was grasping at an illusion. Language is what we say, what we mean, and what we understand—different meanings for different people in different contexts.”
Interesting stuff. I think I’ll have to read some more Wittgenstein.
Share this:
Cloak and Mirrors – Who are We Fighting?
September 5, 2017 in International Affairs, Politics | Tags: Elite interests, Manufacturing Consent, National Socialism, US Politics | by The Arbourist | 6 comments
CJ Hopkins writes a polemic about one of the themes that crops up in leftist literature. The elite, who are our real enemies (of the common people) will employ just about any set of tactics to keep the populace engaged in harmless activity. Bread and circuses if you will.
The marriage of politics and power is nothing new. Yet we get hyperbolic essays like the one Hopkins’ penned for Counterpunch.
“See, up to now, the dilemma we’ve been facing (or some of us have been facing, anyway) is how to respond to the ruling establishment’s concerted campaign to “regime-change” Trump. On the one hand, Trump is a living embodiment of everything the Left opposes. On the other hand, going after Trump has meant carrying water for the fake Resistance, i.e., that global corporatocracy (which, by the way, does not mean “the Jews.” I always like to slip that in to piss off my anti-Semitic readers.) This has been a bit awkward for some of us, restraining our impulse to stick it to Trump (at least on whatever talking points the Resistance is currently putting out) because in doing so we would align ourselves with the ruling establishment’s attempt to demonize, and eventually depose an American president who isn’t playing ball with them properly. If we oppose regime change in other countries, shouldn’t we also oppose it at home? Or do the ruling classes get a pass this time because Trump is such an exceptional monster? But wait … wasn’t Saddam a monster? And Gaddafi? And all the other “Hitlers” that wouldn’t play ball with the corporatocracy? And Assad? Isn’t he a monster?
You can see how confusing all this gets … when you’re trying to figure out how to oppose both the supranational corporatocracy that is superseding sovereign nations as the hegemonic power in the world and the neo-nationalist reaction against it, which is essentially fascist in nature, and which the corporatocracy also opposes … and desperately wants you to help them oppose by buying their manufactured hysteria about Russians, or Nazis, or whatever scary monster they wave in front of your face. After a while, your brain starts to hurt, and you just want someone to make things simple.
Charlottesville Nazis to the rescue! How much simpler could it possibly get? Corporatocracy? What corporatocracy? We got goddamned Nazis coming out of the woodwork! Racist Nazis! Confederate Nazis! Nazi apologists! Nazi sympathizers! This is no time to worry about who’s actually wielding political power, or how they’re manufacturing hysteria and otherwise manipulating people (not you, of course … other people). No, what we need to do now is censor the Internet, and other venues for Nazi hate speech, and round up all these racist Nazis and subject them to anti-Nazi therapy, or anti-racist empathy programs, or just gang up on them and beat them senseless.
OK, sure, that might sound extreme, or authoritarian, or just plain old creepy, but keep in mind that This Is Not Normal! And racism and Naziism is very, very bad. And Love Trumps Hate! And Scope Kills Germs! And we never literally meant that Trump was an actual Russian agent or anything. Forget about all that Russia stuff now. Trump is Hitler. Trump has always been Hitler. America has always been at war with Hitler. America will always be at war with Hitler.”
So what if the shadow elites are orchestrating the rise of token fascist groups in the US? This evasion is still elevating the consciousness of people who were otherwise indisposed to think about, much less act on a political impulse.
If these are the machinations of the supranational corporatocracy it would seem that their plan has more than a few flaws because galvanizing people into action, even the against token enemies of the state, is still awakening people from their political slumber.
Share this:
The DWR Feminist Quote of the Day – bell hooks
September 4, 2017 in Feminism | Tags: bell hooks, The DWR Feminist Quote of the Day | by The Arbourist | 2 comments

Share this:
“Cis” Gender
September 4, 2017 in Housekeeping | by The Arbourist | Comments closed
Cisgender: of, relating to, or being a person whose gender identity corresponds with the sex the person had or was identified as having at birth. — Merriam-Webster
Gender Identity:
- the totality of physical and behavioral traits that are designated by a culture as masculine or feminine
a person’s internal sense of being male, female, some combination of male and female, or neither male or female
— Merriam-Webster
Feminine: having qualities traditionally ascribed to women, as sensitivity or gentleness. — Dictionary.com
Masculine: having qualities traditionally ascribed to men, as strength and boldness. — Dictionary.com
I find these definitions interesting. Many of us are told by members of trans* community that we don’t understand how it feels because we’re “cis.” At first I accepted that. I am a cisgender male. Okay. My “gender identity” matches up with my biological sex. Cool.
But I…
View original post 835 more words
Share this:
Labour Day – What We Fought For
September 4, 2017 in Culture, Economy | Tags: Labour Day, Workers' Rights | by The Arbourist | 1 comment

Share this:
These Are The Four Companies Chosen To Build Concrete Prototypes Of Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful’ Border Wall
September 3, 2017 in Housekeeping | by The Arbourist | 3 comments
That feeling you get when you have a bad dream start to play out in real life…
Share this:
The DWR Sunday Religious Disservice – The Bible
September 3, 2017 in Religion | Tags: Goats, Religion, The DWR Sunday Religious Disservice | by The Arbourist | 1 comment



Your opinions…