You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Politics’ category.
This is how the activist Left abuses polysemy. Polysemy is defined as follows:
So, this is their game. To make their radical propositions seem reasonable they purposefully use words that have a generally accepted meaning, but then at the same time a special transformative meaning for them. The woke activist left does this so they can move the political/social football in a radical direction all the while sounding like they are saying normal, reasonable things.
Let’s take an easy obvious example, let’s look at the word “inclusion”.
“Inclusion” in this case is doing a great deal of work under the hood. The argument from the activists is this – we should include all types of women in female sports that includes “cis-women”¹ and of course “trans – women”.
The mechanism at work here is “inclusion” means accepting the notion that there are more that one type of females in society that play sports. This is the truth married to a lie in action – the woke argument for inclusion inserts the notion that males who call themselves women are actually women and thus in ‘woke reality’ we should include deluded males in the female category.
This is how they wedge their bullshit into society because when confronted by people who comport with reality woke activists can then smear and attack their reality abiding opponents for not being “inclusive”. To low information people seeing the argument taking place they see one side coming out for inclusion and one side being against inclusion (the bigots, the transphobes, insert your preferred vehicle of social coercion…) – but the definition of inclusion the low information people have in their heads is not the same as the one the activists are implicitly following.
So the low information people working on the non activist definition of inclusion are bamboozled into going along with the activists (and the poison pill contained within) thinking that they are supporting a just, more inclusive society.
Obviously, the exact opposite is true. By including men in female sports female athletes are excluded from participating, winning medals, and getting funding to further their excellence in their own category.
This is dichotomy of terms (dialectical even) is not a mistake, because if they led with a clear unambiguous statement of their inane version of ‘inclusion (including males in the female sport categories)’ they would get zero social traction/support for their society corrosive radical views.
¹ – Just a sidebar this is why it is advisable to never accept the term “cis” in your affairs and society. “Cis” erases the authentic definition of what a woman is. Women are exclusively adult human females, full stop. Including males who think they are women in the category blurs and invalidates the category and destroys the ability for people to make reasonable category discernment in social situations.
The contempt our Federal Canadian Government has for our province seems to know no bounds. We are the only province in a Canada that has a democratic mechanism to elect senators. There are currently three elected senators in waiting that were patently ignored, and instead to represent Alberta a radical gender activist Kristopher Wells and a lawyer that has donated at least 30,000 dollars to the federal Liberal Party.
Here is the list of Senators the citizens of Alberta have democratically nominated for the Senate:
So we have a partisan appointment:
“Fridhandler is a corporate lawyer, arbitrator, mediator, and businessman with over 40 years of legal experience.
[…]
Fridhandler has been an active supporter of the federal Liberal Party during his career, serving as the party’s election co-chair in Alberta between 2004 and 2009, according to his biography page on the website of Calgary law firm Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP, where he has been a partner since 1990.”
And then we have the wacko rainbow gender activist:
“Kristopher Wells’s biography describes him as “an educator and a champion for the 2SLGBTQ+ community who has used research and advocacy to help advance diversity, equity, and human rights in Alberta and across the country.”
He is the editor-in-chief of Journal of LGBT Youth, which is the “world’s leading research publication on 2SLGBTQ+ youth,” according to his biography on the website for MacEwan University in Edmonton, where Wells is an associate professor.
Wells has also helped with the creation of the Pride Tape initiative, which several National Hockey League players have adopted in recent years.”
I’m not sure Trudeau could have picked people LESS representative of the people of Alberta. Let’s take a peek at the calibre of Well’s interaction with the public.
JFC. This is the fringe of the fringe. What a completely inappropriate and disappointing decision made by the Liberal Party of Canada.
We end up hurting the most vulnerable people in society when we turn away from empirical evidence and the real world. Listen and enumerate the damage being done to children in the name of ‘combating systemic racism’.
I cannot vote for a party that is favour of undermining parents’ relationship with their children, and a party that is favour of putting children on medical pathways that lead to sterilization and life long medicalization.
Then the Leader of the NDP decides to hide replies like this:
Nope, nope, nope. We can’t have people who major in medical science denial anywhere near the levers of power.
I look forward to the all the major news organizations issuing retractions for their untruthful reporting.
Trying to find video evidence of this… event was a bit challenging. If the video does not start at 6:24 please navigate to that timestamp to witness a PHd demonstrate her craft in ‘breaking’.
Let’s look at some samples of her “scholarship”.
“We argue that breaking’s institutionalization via the Olympics will place breaking more firmly within this sporting nation’s hegemonic settler-colonial structures that rely upon racialized and gendered hierarchies.”
This intentional word salad is endemic across all of the Grievance Study fields – for those not in the know – any course that ends in “Studies” usually qualifies as a Grievance Study. Essentially these are ‘fields’ that have been set up to give employment to ‘scholars’ that otherwise would not be able to find a job anywhere in society.
Thus the only vocation available is one of indoctrinating others into the bullshit and churning out vacuous papers that cite other bullshit papers (citation laundering) in attempt to look like a credible academic subject.
Let’s see what the good Dr.Gunn says on ‘breaking’.
And finally the best for last:
So to put things in perspective – the video of Gunn ‘breaking’ is the prefect illustration of her grasp of the subject, and really her connection to reality.
bleatmop
Mystro
The Arbourist
Dead Wild Roses 
Your opinions…