You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Female Boundaries and Safety’ tag.
I recommend not playing the pronoun game with people. It is a disservice to your autonomy and really, your allegiance to the material reality we all share. When someone demands your disbelieve your senses for their validation it becomes a problem.
Playing the pronoun game is like a taking a gateway drug as it leads you to endorse even more fantastical claims. Human beings cannot change sex, and yet men will tyrannically try and police one’s correct use of language.
I have no problem identifying that male from his aggressive behaviour. Male violence and dominance displays don’t magically change if men wear their hair long and start wearing pink. Calling him a sir corresponds to reality. What responding to the reality we all share doesn’t do is validate his subjective gender identity – here’s the rub though, no one is obligated to so. And really, we shouldn’t because the bullshit above leads to bullshit like this below:
Men in female prisons. Male sex offenders in female prisons. What could possible go wrong? Of course, here in Canada we’re all aboard the unreality train and have made male sex offender’s dreams cum true.
Yeah, so I won’t be playing the pronoun game anytime soon as I support the rights and boundaries of females in Canadian society.
This ruling changes the environment. This UK ruling states that gender critical beliefs are also protected beliefs under law in the the UK. In other words, you can’t be fired from your job for stating the blindly obvious *FACT* that human beings cannot change their sex. This is a huge victory for women, free speech, and of course Ms. Forstater.
Thank you Ms. Forstater for having enough resilience and courage to stand up for women and their rights.
“Ms Forstater, from St Albans in Hertfordshire, did not have her contract renewed at the think tank Center for Global Development (CGD) in March 2019, after posting a series of tweets questioning government plans – which were later scrapped – to let people declare their own gender.
She claimed she was discriminated against because of her beliefs, which include “that sex is immutable and not to be conflated with gender identity”.
In the initial tribunal employment judge James Tayler said that her approach was “not worthy of respect in a democratic society”.
He concluded that Ms Forstater was “absolutist” in her view and said she was not entitled to ignore the rights of a transgender person and the “enormous pain that can be caused by misgendering”.
But the Honourable Mr Justice Choudhury said her “gender-critical beliefs” did fall under the Equalities Act as they “did not seek to destroy the rights of trans persons”.
Ms Forstater said she was “delighted to have been vindicated” but CGD said the decision was a “step backwards for inclusivity and equality for all”.
In a video statement, Ms Forstater said: “I’m proud of the role I’ve played in clarifying the law and encouraging more people to speak up”.
Visit and support women’s rights at sex-matters.org
Pretty much all there is. It is the fight against male supremacy and patriarchy, as it has always been. This quote from Lang Cleg on Mumsnet:
Yep. O Canada. Vulnerable already traumatized women get to spend time with this lovely individual in a Woman’s Shelter. This right here, is the terminus of gender-self id. Unstable predatory men mixing with their target population.
This is not acceptable in a society that purports to care about women and their needs. Bill C-16 needs to be repealed and quickly because this is apparently fine under current legislation. Call your MP… twice.
Oh hey, the Vancouver Women’s Rape Relief Centre that was defunded for not allowing bullshite like this to go down still needs your help, please donate to them if you can here.
bleatmop
Mystro
Dead Wild Roses 
Your opinions…